Stained Glass Rainbows was recently reviewed by Amos Lassen, a gay man who is pretty conflicted about the film. By conflicted I mean that in the review he calls the film "bogus" (actually he uses the word in his subtitle three times "bogus, bogus, bogus") but then in his opening paragraph he says the film is "new, fresh, and exciting and very, very important." So which is it? Bogus? Or very important?
I think the further Amos got from the film, the less he liked it... in particular, the less he liked the ex-gays who appear in the film. When Amos originally published the review the subtitle was "Love Without Judgment" but later, the review was updated to include several additional negative comments about the film along with his new subtitle "Bogus, Bogus, Bogus".
So what do you think of his review? Check it out for yourself...